<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accordance 8.0.5 Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2008/08/accordance-805-update.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2008/08/accordance-805-update.html</link>
	<description>News, articles, and reviews of Bible software</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rubén Gómez</title>
		<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2008/08/accordance-805-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubén Gómez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bsreview.org/blog/?p=1249#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Josh, your question is a very common one these days. I recommend you take a look at the &lt;a href="http://www.bsreview.org/blog/bible-software.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Introduction to Bible Software&lt;/a&gt; I posted today. Your starting point should always be your own study needs. Once you've done that, you should probably consider the fact that Accordance is a mature, full-featured product, and that Logos for Mac is still in its early beta stages (thus we don't know exactly what it will be capable of when it is released). Hope this helps, but the decision is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, your question is a very common one these days. I recommend you take a look at the <a href="http://www.bsreview.org/blog/bible-software.html" rel="nofollow">Introduction to Bible Software</a> I posted today. Your starting point should always be your own study needs. Once you&#8217;ve done that, you should probably consider the fact that Accordance is a mature, full-featured product, and that Logos for Mac is still in its early beta stages (thus we don&#8217;t know exactly what it will be capable of when it is released). Hope this helps, but the decision is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2008/08/accordance-805-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bsreview.org/blog/?p=1249#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>I just got a Mac and want to get Bible software.  What are your thoughts on this: should i get Accordance now or wait for the mac version of logos.  Thanks for your help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a Mac and want to get Bible software.  What are your thoughts on this: should i get Accordance now or wait for the mac version of logos.  Thanks for your help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
