<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Louw-Nida Annotated Texts and False Hits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2006/06/louw-nida-annotated-texts-and-false-hits.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2006/06/louw-nida-annotated-texts-and-false-hits.html</link>
	<description>News, articles, and reviews of Bible software</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rubén Gómez</title>
		<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2006/06/louw-nida-annotated-texts-and-false-hits.html/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubén Gómez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bsreview.org/blog/?p=398#comment-37</guid>
		<description>You are right, of course, in that there would be &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; cases where a certain degree of ambiguity would still remain. But in these relatively few instances, the tagging could include "variants," just as most morphological databases usually do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, of course, in that there would be <em>some</em> cases where a certain degree of ambiguity would still remain. But in these relatively few instances, the tagging could include &#8220;variants,&#8221; just as most morphological databases usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.bsreview.org/blog/2006/06/louw-nida-annotated-texts-and-false-hits.html/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bsreview.org/blog/?p=398#comment-38</guid>
		<description>At &lt;a href="http://www.laparola.net/greco/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.laparola.net/greco/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.laparola.net/greco/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; as well it is possible to do some LN searches. But I agree, until every word in the NT is tagged with its LN number, it is not too useful. The problem (apart from the time required) is that assigning LN numbers requires interpretation, and it is not always clear what number a given appearance of a word should have. Even the LN lexicon recognises this, saying at times "This word in this verse could also be in put in this other category".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At <a href="http://www.laparola.net/greco/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.laparola.net/greco/" rel="nofollow">http://www.laparola.net/greco/</a> as well it is possible to do some LN searches. But I agree, until every word in the NT is tagged with its LN number, it is not too useful. The problem (apart from the time required) is that assigning LN numbers requires interpretation, and it is not always clear what number a given appearance of a word should have. Even the LN lexicon recognises this, saying at times &#8220;This word in this verse could also be in put in this other category&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
